Find a Lawyer

ISLAM-UD-DIN versus MUNIR-UD-DIN

Punjab Local Government Ordinance 1979 Section 24 Punjab Local Council (Election Petitions) Rules, 1979, R8 Election Request Both parties received equal number of votes. Both parties received equal number of votes and such draw As a result, the Appellant was declared successful. Respondents challenged the result in an election petition where the two parties jointly agreed to the counting of votes, which was done in the presence of both parties, The unsuccessful candidate for the CA's lawyer was declared successful as a result of the re-counting Because it had got more votes. Compared to the second order of the Election Tribunal, the Constitution had alleged that many cases were settled on the grounds that the High Court had examined the records and examined all the attendees. There was good reason, in a reasonable decision, that the votes were counted again. It is important to determine the dispute because both candidates received equality. The number of votes is controversial because the electoral tribunal cannot be ordered to be re-counted because of the fact that the matter was overturned by both parties. After receiving an equal number of votes, it was agreed to count the votes, which the party again participated in the counting process. Before the tribunal, it was later not allowed to turn round and object to the jurisdiction of the tribunal. female advocates from Kamokey lawyer