Find a Lawyer

PARVEEN KASSIMALI POPATIYA versus NIZARI COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD.

Proof of Gift in Support of Gift Contradictory Evidence The effect of the approval of an alleged gift to a minor by a person who was not the natural cordian of such a minor was presented in support of an alleged oral gift only by a witness such witness Claimed to be a relative of both donors. And the mother of the end but could not explain the relationship. In order for him to be an effective witness, it was not necessary for him to have any connection with the parties concerned, but such a witness would go a long way in justifying his presence at the gift, thus deepening his credibility. The cumulative effect of contradictory and contradictory evidence of K's testimony concludes that he was neither present at the time of the alleged oral gift by the donor nor when the alleged declaration of gift was executed. Evidence of the witness's alleged verbal gift endorsement was not considered credible and, in addition, such witness alleged that the original documents were referenced. The original documents were still submitted by the deceased donor to the mother of the alleged donor for minor acts, thus, in the circumstances of the alleged plaintiff's oral gift in favor of the minor plaintiff was not proved. That the mother was neither a natural guardian nor appointed by the court was unable to accept gifts from the minor. advocate from Sohawa District Jelum lawyer