MASOOD AHMAD versus GOVT. OF SINDH
The Constitution of Pakistan (1973), the admission of Article 199 medical college, refuses to admit the applicant when he wishes to submit his father's Domicile Certificate, though he has a higher overall score than the last person admitted in this session. Was obtained, the applicant obtained the domicile with acknowledgment. His father's certificate, which was a genuine and valid document claiming that he had submitted the application before the due date for which there was no clear reason why the applicant was not present, in fact Submitted his father's residency certificate. Such domicile certificates were, in all likelihood, submitted by the applicant but were not kept on the record applicant, either due to ignorance or negligence, or due to fellowship with a potential beneficiary. In which a student should not suffer for anything. All possibilities, errors or omissions cannot be kept at his doorstep viable technical stuff. There is no scope for complaints of students from constitutional treatment facilities a year ago, while constitutional petition is pending and current. The admission is complete for years, under which the credit to the last person who was admitted was above the number one. The applicant was allowed to enroll in the current session provided the applicant will be adjusted in the first sitting, which becomes vacant and becomes available in the general course.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Cherat lawyer