Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MAYOR, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, RAWALPINDI versus MUHAMMAD GHAFFAR AND 4 OTHERS


Servant of Punjab Local Councils and Municipal Committees (Retirement) Rules 1966 R4 (1) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Municipal Committee employees against compulsory retirement after 25 years of compulsory retirement service. Constitutional petitions such as retirement were primarily allowed that they were not heard before the retirement orders were passed, which was unfortunate. There was no error or legal implication in the High Court's refusal. It was not pointed out that the High Court had sought remand in cases of leaving employees open. If it is intended for the competent authority to act, it was not strictly guaranteed to interfere with the impugned order of the High Court in accordance with the law and the leave of appeal was denied on the facts of the case. Was.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocate from Pirpai lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.