UMAR SAID versus THE STATE
Arts & amp; Evidence was charged under investigation of evidence that prohibited material was recovered in a truck driven by it, imprisoned under conviction under Article Under The sentence was reduced and the sentence of the accused was retained under Article 4. However, the orders for review of the evidence of Art 3 and 4 were set aside, the prosecution's witnesses did not say anything about the accused in their evidence (although stated in the FLR). Were not enough to get them involved in the crime. It has been alleged that we have gone wrong under the circumstances Arts 3 and 4 Sentencing It is not appropriate for anyone to be punished under Arts 3 and 4 because importing, exporting, transporting, manufacturing, bottling or selling any drug. Including its possession.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
solicitors from Sara e Naurang lawyer