HAJI ABDUL GHAFOOR versus THE STATE
Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (2) Validation of Evidence Cage ??? Record of the trial of the accused was maintained by the trial court, both the accused (husband and wife) were retained, although prohibited. There was a degree of agreement between the two. However, since the husband divorced his wife, he realized that his union was not guaranteed by law. It has been alleged that they have suffered a lot of humiliation in the public as well as their relatives. The intended purpose was to imprison the accused according to what had already been his punishment, while the trial court did not comply with the law for imprisonment of 20 bars for whipping each accused, however, Was increased to 30 convictions.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Khanewal lawyer
