KHIZAR HAYAT versus STATE
The offense of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10/18 Contemporary Code (XLV of 1860), as complimentary to the section 354 Evidence Version, was disclosed by the complainant in his report and not only proved true during the trial It was, but was, even by the defense version, that it was confirmed that the attempt to drag the complainant and remove the string of his pants was not as an attempt to commit adultery, but rather for the complainant. There was a mild attack and it was covered under 355, PPC sentenced the accused guilty so Section 354, under section 10/18 of the Ordinance Was converted to PPC and accordingly his sentence was reduced.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Arifwala lawyer
