Find a Lawyer

BIJAR versus STATE

Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 17 (4) and 20 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 395 testimony of evidence was neither voluntarily made nor contested against each other. Was neither done nor played a specific role with its creator nor was it compulsory and therefore, no opinion on the crime of the accused could be considered. In this case, it was suspected that the doctor did not report the casualty's injuries nor did he have a post-mortem examination, which did not prove the injury certificate containing the details of the injuries and because the victim was not. No reason for the death of the accused could be ascertained. Conditions best law firm from Jaja Abasian lawyer