Find a Lawyer

NADEEM AHMAD MIRZA versus SHAH SULTANA BEGUM

Section 15 (2) (iii) (a) The implementation of a tenancy agreement between the landlord and the tenant / leaseholder suggests that the leaseholder may work with any person in whole or in any place in dispute. Yes, but the lease / tenant cannot fulfill it. Without the consent of the poor or the landlord, the defendant claimed that he was included as a subpoena by the tenant in view of the specific terms in the tenancy agreement and that the landlord was occupied by the landlord. The eviction request filed against the tenant by the source was the necessary party and had to be disqualified as a party to the process during the proceedings. The interlocutor's request for execution as a party to the proceedings for this reason. Excluded in which the defendant did not present any evidence to prove that he The terms of the tenancy agreement were not rejected by the landlord implementing the tenancy agreement that was on the mine or that he had paid any rent to the landlord and under the intervener's location Evidence of subordination was given to the tenant in accordance with the provisions of the contract as to whether the rent was paid by the landlord or whether the landlord or tenant was payable by it; The record intervention was to be decided on the basis of the evidence in view of the actual possession and the admitted facts regarding its implementation. The agreement was an essential aspect and the tenant's expense can be heard in the eviction proceedings before the controller of the rent. advocates from Pind Dadan Khan lawyer