NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPN. versus SINDH GLASS INDUS.
Section 321 of the Confession Court Act (XLIV of 1976), Section 3 Company filed a complaint against the applicants (Establishment) against the Federal Ombudsman, which was signed by a person who claimed to be the chairman of the company. Had gone to the complainant's company to be injured. The government official was appointed its official liquidator, however, and it was decided on the basis of proceedings before him, after previously suspending the former chairman of the company, to end his leadership. The petition was filed and the prosecution stated that the petitioner (Establishment) complained against the former chairman of the company whether he was liable for contempt of court proceedings whether or not the summons order was violated. And in this case the former chairman of the company took legal action on the complaint under question before the Federal Ombudsman. She was gone In the circumstances, the contempt of court application was not applicable
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Rohri lawyer