MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus MEMBER (REVENUE), BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Arts 199 and 185 Land Reform Regulation, 1972 [MLR 1151, para 25 (8) constitutional jurisdiction, the exercise of the High Court in exercising constitutional jurisdiction does not work like a court appeal. To see if the orders brought to him for removal by judicial review face any jurisdictional error or patent being unlawful, such testing should be done on the strength of the record attached to the constitutional petition. Where some record highs were not sought. The Court, which was not itself fatal to the hesitation in the circumstances of the matter, was a matter of fact on the High Court's decision and the situation was maintained in consensus with the decisions of the following courts.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
