Section 7, (v) (c) Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O. VII, R 11 The reduction of court fees was the duty of the court to allow the plaintiff time to pay the lower court fees. It was only on the contrary of the plaintiffs that the trial could be ruled out. The record shows that the First Appellate Court precisely determined that the conduct of the defendants was not contradictory, with which the High Court did not interfere with the first Appellate Court and the High Court correctly followed it. Was. In the case of Siddique Khan, the law enacted by the Supreme Court PLD 1984 SC 289 was termed a trial court which covered the dispute in which the assessment of the value of the suit and non-payment of the court fees were given to both parties. There was an opportunity to present evidence on this matter, therefore, the defendants can present evidence on this matter. The decision of the trial court regarding the reduction of court fees should not be ruled out as an opportunity to support your case. No interference in matters related to the court's search is guaranteed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
