JAHANGIR KHAN TAREEN versus MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE KHAN BALOCH
Articles 62 (2) and 52 Laws of Martyrdom (10 of 1984), Arts 155 (1), 156 and 157 Election Request The right of the witness to cross-examine her oath during cross-examination by her oath Recall, in which he stated in his examination of the Chief, that he had taken the same oath and signed it before the Honorable Commissioner of the Respondents Pliya that the provisions of the Law Town Martyrs, 1984. Elections do not apply to proceedings before the tribunal. And that only government witnesses can refresh their memorandum regarding their earlier statement / document. According to Article 155 (1) of the Canon Evidence, 1984, a witness was allowed to memorize it and when he felt, however, with permission, the court granted Article 155 (3) through the Conway Evidence, 1984. The prosecuting witness was given the right to remind him under examination that he was executed or read by him (though he was not executed by him), a court or tribunal. Prior to this, there was no difference whether the examination of the witness's chief was recorded through his oral statement or in support of which he was previously hanged. Based on the affidavit where he dismissed the chief prosecution witness in his prosecution. The case, his right was within him, which was granted to him to refresh his memorandum under Article 155 (1) of the law, Article 155 (1) of the law, unless the court / tribunal had the opinion The testimony of the witness is reminiscent of the religion, in which case the court or tribunal may reject the prosecution witness's request, in the present case,
Related judgments — Election Tribunal Punjab, 2014
