TARIQ MEHMOOD MURTAZA versus RETURING OFFICER PP-2, RAWALPINDI
Sections 12 and 14 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 63 and 62 nomination papers rejected as Articles Provincial Assembly under Articles 63 and 62 of the Constitution, do not satisfactorily explain the ownership of any private limited company and land. Was made, and the said private company was on the SECP register and was not yet dissolved, so under the law, the appellant was required to disclose that he was the owner of the said company even if he owned a business Was not transferred to the appellant on 19 February 2006, while the father of the appellant passed away in the year 2006, ESSO, the appeal claims that a father was purchased in the name of a ground of appeal. Therefore, the appellant not only made false declarations but also concealed his assets and thus made false statements / declarations on oath and consequently was disqualified from being elected or elected as a member of the Provincial Assembly, under the circumstances. General Chat Chat Lounge n
Related judgments — Election Tribunal Punjab, 2014
