Find a Lawyer

PAKISTAN STATE OIL COMPANY LTD. versus PUNJAB LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 199 Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Sections 25A & 38 (3A) Constitutional jurisdiction Practicing rehabilitation of the complaint filed by his lawyer by employers, employers withdrew this request. The latest application was filed with a satisfactory request for delay in filing a fresh application with the permission of the court. Employers initially objected that the new application for a complaint filed 10 months after the Notice of Complaint Notice was withheld over time and was not applicable at the same time in the ground courts. The employer's initial objection to the non-submission of the complaint was rejected and the employees were dismissed in pursuance of the previous complaint request stating that the request for a new complaint was within time when the employer The constitutional petition was challenged as well as conflicting interim orders. A preliminary objection raised by the employer regarding the limitation was rejected while the complaint request was still pending before the lower court and a decision on the merit was still pending, in the constitutional jurisdiction early. Point-wise decisions should also not be allowed to be questioned because it delays administration. The constitutional jurisdiction can be made available only in a timely and grave danger when valuable personal and property rights are at stake and subject to the condition that no other appropriate remedy was available to employers. There was no danger. Only the first objection raised by employers will be reversed by the courts below property advocates from Blitang lawyer