DABIR HUSSAIN versus AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN
Section 34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 requires the applicant to pay interest-bearing interest in the form of a loan from the applicant questioning the applicant for the payment of such interest contract, under which the respondent (bank) Clear terms were raised with the applicant having been loaned by the applicant. Regarding its obligation in question, the applicant should have refused to avail the facility with the condition of payment of the interest attached to it when the applicant had obtained the loan and used a large sum of money on it. The Express understands that he will be responsible for paying as well. The respondent may not be interested in the bank anymore, saying that such condition was illegal in any way or that the non-Islamic applicant, thus, could not be allowed to take advantage of his own proceedings. Was explicitly bound by the terms on which she was a party
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Mandi Faizabad lawyer