MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN MEHANTI versus ABDUL RASHID GODIL
Details of alleged corrupt and illegal practices of excluding election petitions during the trial of sections 55 (1) (b) and 63, which were not mentioned in the election petition, affected the petitioners' returning candidates and the Election Commission All kinds of serious charges were leveled against him. Until the election results were finalized, but no details were provided about the polling stations where such illegal acts or illegal practices were committed, and who was also told who witnessed such acts or exercises. The applicants also did not specifically mention about the alleged illegal acts committed. On one side all the polling stations in all constituencies accused the applicants that the election equipment was delayed from 1/2 to 5 hours at the polling stations but the location and location of such polling stations have not been stated and also stated. How the applicants came to know. When they had already boycotted the election and left the polling stations, no affidavit was filed. The applicants allege that none of the current applicant's polling agents supported their allegations with their election requests. Applicants alleged that the returning officers handed over election materials to unauthorized persons who misused it in favor of returning candidates by sealing ballot papers and stamping ballot packs. Unauthorized polling stations but again applicants did not mention the location of such unauthorized polling stations in their applications.
