SYED MASHOOQ MOHIUDDIN SHAH versus SYED FAZUL ALI SHAH
Section 33, 46, & 68 and Q 70 Legislative Evidence (of 1984 of the Ten), Article 2 ((e) Election Petition Proof of casting fake thumb impressions of fraudulent votes or voting during polling Non-use of magnetic inks is a sufficient (but not complete) impact of ballot papers used in connection with 91 polling stations, as well as counter-voting procedures, as well as voter report thumbs for electoral rolls and counting statements. The National Database and Registration Authority (AD NADRA) has been sent to confirm the feedback. It is learned that he received 65511 counters for the test, but 12818 of these counters were not able to match the fingerprints. The fingerprints on counterfeiting at 23356 were of poor quality and did not pass the test. The remaining thumb impressions on the counters were successfully validated, and that verification of the 118 thumb impressions failed, in connection with the 23356 fingerprints of poor quality mentioned in the report above. Used counters could not be processed. Due to the poor quality of fingerprints because the ink used during polling did not have any properties, the Election Commission approved the magnetic ink sample according to NADRA's proposal but there is no evidence that the relevant Authorities provided ink accordingly. The sample applicant relied heavily on the process of forensic verification of thumb impressions through Nadra, but due to their poor quality due to ink used during the Nadra pool.
