Section 33 (?) (e), (38 (ation) and Representative 70 Rules of Representation (Conduct of Elections), 1977, R24). The election laws regarding the officials holding elections do not affect the outcome of the election, which Scope Petitioner, who was a runner-up candidate for the National Assembly seat, alleged that some of the presiding officers. And failing to comply with the provisions of section 33 (2) (e). 38 (9) of the Representative People Act 1976, that under such circumstances the entire election under Section 70 of the Representation People Act, 1976 should be declared invalid, the accuracy presiding officers of the various polling stations did not prepare the counting statement as That in Section 38 (9) of the Representative People Act, Form XIV provided under R24 of the Representative Form (Election of Conduct) Rules 1977, 1976 and instead of plain paper they were prepared by the Assistant for the various polling stations. There were some other contradictions in the counting statements. Returning officers, who were on prescribed Form XIV, but in some, the presiding officers did not mention the votes of all contesting candidates, including the applicant, and in some they did not provide their thumb impressions or their names in the national data. The Base and Registration Authority (NADRA submitted its report on inspection of the thumb impressions of 32865 counters from 47 polling stations) also reported that the report was highly contradictory because of the poor quality of the thumb impressions.
