RAB NAWAZ versus THE STATE
The Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 section 10 (2) and the 16th Convention (3 CLV of 1860), section 494 evidence was appreciated in 1975, after which they were still living after the expiry. ? The duration of the admission and the complainant filed a case against the accused in the evidence of the prosecution in 1987, therefore, on his face, it seems that he cannot be relied upon and the defense version in the absence of proof of prosecution. Was. The suspects were acquitted in a condition to be fully accepted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates Abbaspur lawyer
