MURID HUSSAIN versus STATE
Section 173 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 10 (3) / 10 (2) Complainant who filed a case against the accused under Section 10 (3) of Ordinance VII of 1979. The police investigation is a consensual sexual orientation party and its ordinance complained to the complainant as a co-accused in coordinating with the aforementioned ordinance complainant, who was directly involved in the police case. The complaint was filed. The Sessions Court was also pending, however, on the request made by the complainant, he declared it as the prosecution's witness as the accused, the Sessions Court dealing with the complainant (the accused in the challan case) as a witness. Was ordered to determine the matter illegally and without jurisdiction, and the case was remanded to the sessions court so that the complaint could be settled and the police case followed. The PLD is below in 1966 SC 708
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Head Marala lawyer