AQIL-UR-REHMAN versus STATE
Rape of the Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (2) Testimony of Martyrdom The male accused married a female accused during the marriage with his ex-wife, who was forbidden because the parties involved in the case were Sunni and Hanafi. Jurisprudence and the two women were so close to each other that if either of these men were men, they could not legally arrange for each other to be married. For this reason, the male accused habituated to his residence with his ex-wife, who they knew, was guilty of adultery. Eats as considered under Section 4 of the accused's ordinance sentence, consequently confirming some reduction in their punishment.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Mastoi lawyer
