KHUDA BAKHSH versus SMALL INDUSTRIES CORPORATION
Applicant's plea of Code of Conduct 1908A XVI, R1 and Section 115 of the witnesses claimed that he had referred the list of witnesses to the Reader's Court for a similar charge on the record of the case, but no He was either misplaced by the officer or disqualified by the officer. Removed from record by the court, or by anyone interested in you, the trial court asked for a report from Ahmed, who stated that the list of witnesses had been misplaced in the fact of the petitioner. The claim is indirectly supported by the fact that he has actually filed a witness case. After stopping Ahad's report, it was deemed necessary for the court to inquire into the matter and provide the parties with an opportunity to present their relevant evidence in the trial court's failure to prosecute the case. Material irregularities in the exercise of jurisdiction granted by the court
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Daud Khel lawyer
