Find a Lawyer

HABIB ULLAH versus COMMISSIONER

Land Acquisition Act 1894 Section 4, 5 A & 17 Land Acquisition Rules, 1983, RR 10 and 11 Notice of Acquisition of Land Acquisition in accordance with which land was obtained in dispute for establishment of small industrial estate. Yes, the owner of this land was the first to challenge. The land was not being acquired for any public purpose, but was being acquired for a corporation for which it could not be legally acquired. Secondly, the land adjoining the town in the dispute was for fodder and the cultivation could not be done because only the vacant lot could be obtained for the establishment of industrial estate notification as there was no doubt about it. The land under question is being acquired by the people. It is not intended and for the benefit of any company or corporation as the landowners claim to be Punjab Small Industries Corporation, it was an agency run and founded by the provincial government, As such it was a part and parcel of the landowners' official dispute not acquired for public works, but was repelled, only for the benefit of the company, while in the conflict a part of the land was being solved. The rest was undoubtedly empty and the member, the Board of Revenue, visited the site himself and discovered the fact that no small industry There was another suitable area for the establishment of the state for which land in dispute was being acquired. The owners of the land who could not get the land in dispute as it was moving, were repulsed. The purpose in which the industry was rightly acquired advocates from Kandhkot lawyer