Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

BASHIR AHMAD versus SARDAR KHAN


Sindh Crimes Control Act 1975 Section 14 Criminal Code (v. 1898), Section 561 Proceedings Tribunal did not mention the section 14 clause that attracted the accused in the case, it is not legal to take serious action against it. Was. The Tribunal's non-bailable warrant arrest against the accused was neither appropriate nor did the police declare a legal report against the accused, nor did it provide any details of the time and place of the incident in which a private person was a witness. Was not presented as. The accused were not taken legally, their continuation was similar to the misuse of court proceedings and accordingly they were dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
criminal advocate from Gharo lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.