Find a Lawyer

FARID AKHTAR HADI versus MUHAMMAD LATIF GHAZI

Civil Procedure Code Order XXVII of the CCC Summary Procedure OXXXVII for Settlement Tool, R 2 Suitable for Receipt of Money Based on Promise Notes (XXVI 1881), S 118, Promise Notes Evidence of its implementation, its confirmation and its receipt was considered by the defendant's plaintiff that the promissory note was signed by him. However, they claimed that their signatures were taken at their home by fraud and to prove that the defendant's signature was taken by fraud, but they did not prove the incidents of fraud. However, the promise of trust-signed signatures was acknowledged by the defendant on notice, under section 118, under the Settlement Devices Act, 1881, the defendant was in favor of the defendant on the receipt of consideration. Had been processed, the defendant refused to refund the promise sum, so the case was appropriate for the plaintiff to file. OXXXVII, R 2, the collection of money in the court's summary jurisdiction under the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 law websites from Khair Pur Mir lawyer