Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MALA versus HASHIM


The Canal and Drainage Act 1873 Section 68 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Land Reform Regulation, 1972 [MLR 115], paragraph 25, allowed the applicants to consider the clashes in the leave. Were using a lot of neutral nickel. The same was confirmed for a long time under non-governmental arrangements, in regular bans in 1980. After a few years, the defendant had been deprived of such arrangements for so long and that only the respondents had split up which was convenient for them and in favor of Nika Onepoint regarding the prohibition by Martial Law. There was no basis to deprive the applicant. Against the distribution of land, Rule 115 was also pressed to say that the application raised other points which need to be examined, which required a leave grant for appeal.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocates from Patoki lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.