Find a Lawyer

BASHIR AHMAD versus MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN

The offense of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (3), the law assesses these testimonies (10 of 1984), Arts 121 and 122, the burden of proof if the accused does not believe himself to be mature at the time of commission, the crime will be prosecuted. Such a defense should have been adopted at the outset, and it should include, to bring your case under section 7 of the Ordinance, in the nature of an exception to section 10 (3). The age of the accused, especially in his knowledge, had the burden of proving that he was not an adult at the time of the commission of the crime, but he did not mention much in that regard. However, strong evidence could not be obtained to prove his claim that Bald and plea alleges that he was not an adult when he was committed to the girl affected by the adultery. Therefore, it was not accepted to believe that Section 7 of the ordinance was not intended to bring punishment. n And accordingly the conviction of the accused was maintained law firms from Khanewal lawyer