Find a Lawyer

THE STATE versus HAFEEZ

Criminalization of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (3) / 11/13/14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 203 The appeal for the reasons given by the trial court for the acquittal of the DD accused is excessive. And had no legal power. Alibi was suspected by the accused based on the allegations and assertions that the trial court had accepted through false pretrial evidence, the prosecutors had completely trapped the suspect for committing rape and his Evidence that was not consistent in the inconsistent examination was corroborated. There was no hostility between the parties through his father and medical evidence and the country was charged with the courts under section 10 (3) of the Ordinance, therefore, by a trial court The charge was proved and he was acquitted. Which was not based on the principles laid down in the administration of criminal justice, which resulted in the accused being convicted under Section 10 (3) of the Order. Section 382B, RI with the benefit of CR PC and sentenced to 30 years of probation and ten years. property advocates from Killa Abdullah lawyer