Qazf (Enforcement Border) Ordinance 1979 11 8 11 Diagnosis of Evidence The defendant's diagnosis of adultery was proved by oral and documentary evidence, under which he was charged in his statements under Sections 342 and 340 (2). Yes, the CRPC also admitted that the exact position taken by the accused was not confirmed and that during the interrogation the same was found to be false as well as the accused against the complainant at a later stage. The words of punishment for adultery by them were also unclear in their import; thus, they were committed by the accused and accordingly their punishment and punishment were given. Retained
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
