Find a Lawyer

TARIQ HUSSAIN SHAH versus STATE

Power of attorney on behalf of one of the required remand cases of irregular brain O XLI, R 23 and OXXXII, R 3 cases against minors and persons under the Civil Procedure Code Order XXXII of the CBC suit. Was presented to the court while the other was represented, while such defendants (who were minors when the case was filed) were again treated as minors and the court's reader was appointed. The guardian ad was never issued notice to the defendants in the affidavit; notice was required for the defendants who had obtained the majority during the proceedings but no notice was presented to the suit twice. Moved to different courts but no notice was issued In the absence of such notice to the relevant defendants, the aggrieved party may request that they do not know in which court the LAPS for the appointment of PR. To appear in the court. In the absence of notice to the open guardian and the majority of his acquittals for the minor defendants, as well as the transfer of the case to other courts, therefore, on the basis of law, the trial court's remand, famous lower court advocate from North Wazirstan lawyer