Find a Lawyer

FAROOQ AHMAD versus RENT CONTROLLER, LAHORE

Code of Conduct 1908 Section 12 (2) Ordinance of Restrictions on West Pakistan Citizens Rent (VI of 1959), Sections 13 and 17 Order of Challenge to Settlement was finally passed against the tenant, but the litigation between the parties. Was the result of The tenant had filed an application under Section 12 (2), CPC, after which the withdrawal proceedings were not accepted, together with the request for r; jection object and several other miscellaneous applications. It claimed that all these requests were guaranteed regular and detailed investigation, nothing was fresh. In any of these applications, but in one way or another revolve around the same disputes that were already received by the tenant during the trial of the withdrawal request and were overturned by the courts where they were during the trial. A fact-creating object was picked up and traced. It was not obliged to re-consider or reconsider it, the rent controller, in an application for an objection or its second request, under s12 (2) during the process of the nature of the application, c. A detailed inquiry can be made on the request of the PC or the objection when it raised a specific question which was not answered or answered during the trial where a point was raised in the case between the parties. And it was decided. On the same topic, it will not guarantee a new trial / inquiry, in fact the law did not consider justice, but it would never encourage misconduct if the tenant resides. Satisfied best advocate from Thana Bula Khan lawyer