GHULAM FARID versus PATHANI
Court Fees Act 1870 Sections 7 (iv) (c) and 7 (iv) (c) (iv) (a) and (v) (a) [as amended] = Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 Plaintiffs denied the sale of the land due to the rights arising out of such a suit and consequent relief, and the plaintiff refused to appear before the Revenue Officer in connection with the change. And filed a lawsuit to abolish the sales mutation on the score. The plaintiff's case for fraud and misrepresentation falls under section 7 (iv) (c) for payment of court fee count data, and not section 7 (iv) (c) (iv) ( a), (as amended), under the terms of the Court Fees Act, 1870 Claimant, Section 7 (iv) (c), the claim for favor of the Court Fees Act and the resulting relief from such declaration The relief claimant was entitled to place his costs on the relief sought in the plaintiff's case. And the document cannot be rejected (for which it was not a party) for cancellation of the document, subject to this question, for a court fee and for the purpose that the total value of the land is authorized and approved. It is paid for in change.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Naukundi lawyer