Find a Lawyer

CHAIRMAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, MUZAFFARABAD versus KHAMDO BIBI

A. XIV, Applicant for the formation of R1 matters, applied for the reconstruction of the record that it was terminated. Dismissal of the application Regarding the accuracy of the facts in the petition, which can be decided in the light of the evidence where the parties have to decide the matter, without setting up the matter in the trial court and providing the opportunity to add evidence. The case was decided which was not approved by law. Courts should voice their opinion on all relevant points / facts that were born or raised in a case. Additional District Judge for a new decision after setting up the case and giving the parties the opportunity to present evidence.

Related judgments — High Court Azad Kashmir, 2014

• MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN v. MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM 2014 YLR 1054
• IFTIKHAR AHMED KHAN v. AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION MIRPUR 2014 PLC(CS) 1055
• Mst. WALAYAT BEGUM v. MUHAMMAD AFSAR 2014 CLC 1103
• SHAISTA JABEEN v. SAMMIYA MUNIR 2014 MLD 1104
• MUHAMMAD AZAM v. MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN 2014 MLD 1155
• CHINAR POWER (PVT.) LIMITED MUZAFFARABAD v. AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR 2014 CLD 1167
• KHADIM HUSSAIN v. COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION MANGLA DAM 2014 YLR 1176
• SPINTEX LIMITED v. EMPLOYEES OLD AGE BENEFITS INSTITUTION (E.O.B.I.) 2014 CLC 1281

All High Court Azad Kashmir judgments of 2014 →

pakistani advocates Kot Mithan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes