Find a Lawyer

SYED NISAR HUSSAIN SHAH versus SAHIBZADA ABDUL RASHID

O IX, R 13 Demarcation Act (IX of 1908), Article 164 Petition to set aside the ex parte decree, the ex parte decree for the starting point passed on 28 2 2008, while such application was filed on 27 filed 2008 The 30-day extension limit for filing such an application shall begin to run from the date of the provision of section 164 of the Limitation Act, 1908. Such an application is filed 89 days after the decree has been passed.

Related judgments — High Court Azad Kashmir, 2014

• MUHAMMAD AZAM v. CUSTODIAN OF EVACUEE PROPERTY AJ&K MUZAFFARABAD 2014 CLC 19
• ZAHEER AHMED SHEIKH v. AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR 2014 PLC(CS) 56
• NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN MUZAFFARABAD v. MUHAMMAD HANIF BUKHARI 2014 PCrLJ 58
• SOHAIL AHMED v. RENT CONTROLLER/SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, MIRPUR 2014 YLR 77
• Ch. MUHAMMAD SAEED v. CUSTODIAN OF EVACUEE PROPERTY, AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR 2014 YLR 98
• ABDUL JABBAR v. State 2014 PCrLJ 99
• NAEEM AHMED ABBASI v. AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary, Muzaffarabad 2014 PLC(CS) 237
• MUHAMMAD SABIR v. AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE Of JAMMU AND KASHMIR 2014 MLD 242

All High Court Azad Kashmir judgments of 2014 →

how to become a advocate from Rangoo lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes