Find a Lawyer

NAEEM AHMED ABBASI versus AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR GOVERNMENT THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, MUZAFFARABAD

Failure to meet the required minimum qualification principles of Section 44 Writ Petition Civil Service Appointment Audio / Video Technician, required minimum qualification with a matriculation in science while three years in the field of highly qualified electronics petitioner The diploma was refused permission to take part in the tests and interviews as they did not have the least qualifications which matriculated with the Induction Petitioner Science and also got a Bachelor of Science degree in Electronics. There was no one who could not be considered less qualified. Appointment But if a high qualification candidate was available, the applicant with the minimum qualification bar accuracy was not matriculated with a science subject but was not in possession of a Diploma in Electronics Petitioner for the post under question. At least the eligibility was not met. Which lacks the minimum qualification, so is not eligible for appointment so the written request is dismissed

Related judgments — High Court Azad Kashmir, 2014

• SOHAIL AHMED v. RENT CONTROLLER/SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, MIRPUR 2014 YLR 77
• Syed NISAR HUSSAIN SHAH v. Sahibzada ABDUL RASHID 2014 MLD 86
• Ch. MUHAMMAD SAEED v. CUSTODIAN OF EVACUEE PROPERTY, AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR 2014 YLR 98
• ABDUL JABBAR v. State 2014 PCrLJ 99
• MUHAMMAD SABIR v. AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE Of JAMMU AND KASHMIR 2014 MLD 242
• AZHAR HUSSAIN GILLANI v. ELECTION TRIBUNAL AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR 2014 CLC 314
• MUHAMMAD ASHRAF KHAN RAJA v. KHAN MIR KHAN 2014 YLR 336
• MUHAMMAD NAZIR CHAUDHARY v. AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR 2014 PLC(CS) 361

All High Court Azad Kashmir judgments of 2014 →

female advocates from Killa Saifullah lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes