Find a Lawyer

STATE THROUGH ADVOCATE-GENERAL AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR MUZAFFARABAD versus MUSHTAQ AHMED QURESHI

In the 265 K & 249 A Qunun e Shahadat (10 of 1984), Article 129 (g) evidence, the Scope Prosecutor revealed that the accused was guilty of two counts of non-possession of evidence and possession of evidence before the trial court. Did not submit. Such evidence was fatal to the prosecution; the reasons recorded in the impugned order were solid and authentic trial court after the definition of the evidence, the contents of the report under section 73, 73, CRPC and others on record. Documents approve the verdict, the recorded documents in favor of the accused have doubled. In the circumstances the appeal for innocence was dismissed

Related judgments — High Court Azad Kashmir, 2014

• FOREST DEPARTMENT through Secretary Forest, Azad Government of the State of Jammu and Kashmir, Muzaf v. SHABBIR HUSSAIN 2014 CLC 538
• MUHAMMAD FAZAL v. MUHAMMAD ILYAS 2014 YLR 569
• Dr. MUHAMMAD IQBAL v. GOVERNMENT OF AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR 2014 PLC(CS) 585
• MENDI KHAN v. INAYAT ALI 2014 MLD 711
• Syed SHARAFAT HUSSAIN NAQVI v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR 2014 PLC(CS) 754
• JAMROZ KHAN v. MUHAMMAD AFZAL KHAN 2014 MLD 783
• JAVAID IQBAL v. INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, AZAD KASHMIR GOVERNMENT MUZAFFARABAD 2014 PLC(CS) 787
• TAXATION OFFICER/DEPUTY COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX KOTLI A.K. v. SAID AKBAR 2014 PTD 793

All High Court Azad Kashmir judgments of 2014 →

inheritance advocates near Karore Lalisan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes