Find a Lawyer

GHAUS BUX versus ALTAF HUSSAIN

0 XLI, Rr 23 & 31; AV11, R11 and Section 115 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Section 172 of the appellate court's decision was not made a party to the jurisdiction of the jurisdiction when the appeal If the decision was necessary it should refer to the appellate court. Focus, record trucks and reasons for the decision, filed under O XLI, R 31, Civil Code of Conduct, 1908, so that the appellate court did not investigate any matter, to the extent that its decision was defective and should be referred to the appellate court. 'S decision can be set aside. Even if the trial court's decision and decision are set aside, it will not qualify because the trial court had failed to settle the matter on jurisdiction and it had violated Section 172 (2) (iv), West Pakistan. Had not considered the implications of the provisions contained in the Land Revenue. The High Court of 1967, while exercising the supervised jurisdiction, can avoid the impugned technical ability to correct the jurisdiction of the lessor. online advocate from Haripur lawyer