Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SAID CLINIC, KARACHI versus NAEEMA JAMSHED


Sections 22 and 30 of the Workman's Compensation Act 1923 Appeal Widow, upon the obligee employer's objection, filed several claims regarding his salary, bonuses, mortgages and group insurance through the employee's own request that his clinic. The business establishment, the widow's plea commissioner, was dismissed, but the appellate tribunal dismissed the commissioner's order, after the High Court examined the witnesses and decided the case. Remanded, witnesses, group insurance claim filed against widow and trial court order The claim of the second leave of appeal was not permissible, as against the order of the Commissioner only such appeal can be filed as mentioned in section 30 of the Act. The trial court's order did not fall within the provisions of this section

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Cherat lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.