SAID CLINIC, KARACHI versus NAEEMA JAMSHED
Sections 22 and 30 of the Workman's Compensation Act 1923 Appeal Widow, upon the obligee employer's objection, filed several claims regarding his salary, bonuses, mortgages and group insurance through the employee's own request that his clinic. The business establishment, the widow's plea commissioner, was dismissed, but the appellate tribunal dismissed the commissioner's order, after the High Court examined the witnesses and decided the case. Remanded, witnesses, group insurance claim filed against widow and trial court order The claim of the second leave of appeal was not permissible, as against the order of the Commissioner only such appeal can be filed as mentioned in section 30 of the Act. The trial court's order did not fall within the provisions of this section
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Kacha Khooh lawyer
