Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD JAZIB ROOMI versus FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

Sections 7 and 10 of the Federal Public Service Commission's Rules for Competitive Examination Allotment Safe Quota Appellants were candidates that included the written examination as well as the Wawa Voice of Competitive Examination 2010 and were included in the Punjab quota. That every grade had to be posted. Consideration should be taken separately for the purpose of allocating fixed merit and the provincial quota should be calculated in addition to allocating seats in open merit. Appellants' validity claim that a specific quota should begin with the exception of open merit seats, was not a rationale. According to the fixed policy, the candidates of Punjab province were allotted against open merit posts in the same number in different groups / services irrespective of their gender up to the total merit position and only female candidates in Punjab. Specific quota for women quota was allocated against the remaining posts. Cis deleted in case

Related judgments — Islamabad, 2014

• RIAZ AHMED v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN 2014 PLD 29
• MUHAMMAD ZUBAIR v. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Interior, Islamabad 2014 PLD 31
• MUHAMMAD TARIQ MALIK v. PAKISTAN through Secretary Establishment Division 2014 PLD 38
• SAAD JAN v. F.B.I.S.E. 2014 MLD 41
• UMAR ABBASI v. MUMTAZ AHMAD SIDDIQUI 2014 YLR 63
• Haji SAIF ULLAH KHAN BANGASH v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN 2014 CLD 83
• MASTER TEXTILE MILLS v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2014 PLD 83
• Mst. NOMAIL ZIA v. ADNAN RIAZ 2014 CLC 87

All Islamabad judgments of 2014 →

immigration advocates contact from Landi Kotal lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes