Arts 199 and 212 Restoration of Constitutional Petition A retaliatory action was initiated against the applicant for the release and diversion of civil service PWP II funds, in which three inquiry officers were briefly converted but no record was provided, despite repeated requests. And investigative action was taken. The applicant quickly showed distrust of the inquiry officer and a showcase notice was issued to the applicant without providing the inquiry report and recording the statement of defense witnesses, the applicant filed a constitutional petition, after which, Respondents assured to follow this procedure, the applicant never objected to the commencement of the inquiry, but only the authorities were requested not to restrict the legal procedure, even before the constitutional petition Despite assurances before the court, the authority had taken a stand on which method Was followed by the R's can not be proven by any documentary evidence that the applicant can effectively discomfort. When the court was not acting by a competent authority or authorized officer under the provisions of law or if any misconduct came to light, the High Court may direct the accused to act in accordance with the law and proceed to inquiry. Is not against the law. In the event of a violation of the Constitution or the rules, the only way to remain with the person in distress was to allow the constitutional application of the High Court's constitutional jurisdiction.
