AEROTRON (PRIVATE) LIMITED versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE PRIME MINISTER (CHIEF EXECUTIVE)
Chapter III, Para 22 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Appeals Lux Standing Principal and Agent Relations Applicants were the sole representative of the foreign company operating on the helicopters, respondents / authorities wrote to the foreign company stating that Applicants are not clear about any contact with the military in terms of security. And defense organizations, therefore, were asked by foreign companies to change their representatives. Although the petitioners are acting as agents of their foreign principals, they have no written or oral agreement with the respondents / authorities and they do not claim any breach by the respondents. Can do. They were outraged against the principal who had closed the contract between them on account of correspondence of the respondents / authorities. The principals were not made a party to the proceedings nor were they charged and petitioners. Did not seek relief against the principals in accordance with the law. When the contracts were not directly related to the respondents, they did not execute an agreement between the applicants and the defendants, after the agreement between the applicants and the defendants was not executed. The applicable terms and conditions are governed by them. Prohibition for their rights cannot be enforced by the procurement procedures and guidelines or by the rules of public procurement because they claim that the applications were dismissed in circumstances.
