Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

BEGUM MAI versus S.H.O., POLICE STATION TAPISHEN DUNYANPUR


Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Sections 10, 11 and 16 Convictions (XLV of 1860), Section 307/34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 FIR abolished: High Court approves arrest before submissions This allegation is guaranteed that the prosecutor may consider the counsel for presenting him as a prosecution witness, rather than presenting him as a co-accused. The police were in the direction of a suggestion and not the one-way police, therefore, it cannot be said that the accused was prohibited from challenging the right by the said order or otherwise by the trial court on the stand of the accused. The decision must be made. The evidence contained by the parties before it and the High Court will not terminate such proceedings of the trial court. The constitutional application was dismissed in the circumstances.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocate from Jhand lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.