HABIB BANK LIMITED versus AULIA ENGINEERING
Banking Companies (Recovery of Loans) Ordinance 1979 Section 2 (f) (i) [As amended by Banking Companies (Recovery of Loans) Amendment Act 1992]] Section 2 (f) (i) of the Ordinance is one million The words appeared in XIX 1979 1979 of words, replacing ten million words now resulting in an increase of ten million rupees in the jurisdiction of the special court set up by the federal government, and from this place the price increased to this limit. Exceeded the suit that could be prosecuted. The High Court Banking Companies (Recovery of Loans) (Amendment) Act, 1992, even though it was pre-eminent in the role, could affect pending cases before the High Court when the amount in the suit is up to one million. Now the case will be prosecuted by a special court constituted by the Federal Government and not sent to the High Court pending High Court files, where the amount of money does not exceed ten million rupees. r, which was established after the enactment of the Banking Companies (Debt Recovery) (Amendment) Act 1992, on August 1, 1992, its papers will be returned to the plaintiffs for submission to the appropriate courts, under which the Amendment Act Has provisions. The same procedure would apply to pending cases as well [interpreting the constitution]
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Islamabad lawyer