Find a Lawyer

GHULAM HUSSAIN versus FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN

Section 2 and 4 of the Interim Constitution Act of 1974 (XXXI) of the Foreigners Act (1974), Section 2 (A) [as defined in the Aadhaar Jammu and Kashmir in accordance with the law in Azad Jammu and Kashmir (Law of I 1959) ), Article 3 The subject holding the passport of the State of India or Pakistan, whether he is deprived of the status of a state subject and becomes a foreigner with the passport of either of the two countries, is a state subject, in modern times. There is no such nationality, there are such citizens. The state and state did not have the status of having a passport of any country, which holds the passports of a small number of countries like India and Pakistan, which are under the complete control of the state in different parts of the state of Jammu and Kashmir, both parts of the state. The articles I live in have no means. Traveling all over the world except through the passports of the country where some part of their territory is located, without any prejudice as their state subjects, the passport will not, thus, determine the status of the state on this subject. But without a document that would legalize its international travel, without affecting the status of its state article, the passport could not even be considered proof of the nationality of a person whose acceptance of residence is part of India or Pakistan. Comes in populated areas. The state article cannot be denied in any part of the state for its right to housing and settlement, as guaranteed by the interim constitution is subject to the appropriate sanctions. He is based in Kashmir. Any of the two parts of the state ask a advocate free from Nowshera lawyer