Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IQBAL KHAN versus NOOR MUHAMMAD

Azad Jammu and Kashmir Land Reforms Act 1960 Section 25 (4) Azad Jammu and Kashmir Land Reform Rules, 1960, R14 Failure to submit compensation for the acquisition of professional tenancy rights, appointed by the Sub-Assistant Land Commissioner. The landlord was then instructed to deposit a certain amount as compensation for payment to the occupied tenant and to transfer the property to him, the Land Commissioner, in his review, Subcontinent Land Commissioner Reversed decision and occupation allowed the tenant to deposit the compensation amount within. One month from the date of the order, the Land Commissioner was only able to hear against the orders passed by the Deputy Land Commissioner and not against the order of the Sub-Assistant Land Commissioner, which was not so extensive as to provide for the amending powers under which all Authorities should be included. In the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Land Reforms Act, 1960 or the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Land Reform Rules, 1960, the occupying tenant had the right to challenge the order passed by the Sub-Assistant Land Commissioner before the Deputy Land Commissioner and not before The Land Commissioner's modification authority under the Act was of limited application, ultimately linked to all orders. Under the Act, in fact, upon the orders of the amended and the Appeal, the order passed after the sub-Assistant Land Commissioner became immovable, the Land Commissioner failed to deposit the same occupancy tenant's compensation at the specified time. Was unable to ask questions. Therefore, his tenancy ended up being rented out, while the landlord's ownership rights were returned to him so that he could pay the occupied tenant. Pakistan, top advocate family court from Chiniot lawyer