ABDUR REHMAN versus DISTRICT JUDGE, MUZAFFARABAD (ELECTION TRIBUNAL), MUZAFFARABAD
Rr 56 (4) and 59 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), 0 1, R 10 Election Petition Respondents (Applicants before the Election Tribunal) apply to candidates who have participated in their election petition before the Election Tribunal, but Returning Officer Returning Officer When will not the election petition be implemented as a suitable party in an election petition, the applicant had to be in the ranks of the respondents, in his election application, the candidates had to compete who Was enforced because such an applicant should also request full details of anyone Will. Mention the date and place of the commission for any such malpractices, material irregularities or other illegal acts, along with the names of those responsible for such practices or proceedings, along with corrupt practices, material irregularities or other illegal acts. The respondents (petitioner before the Election Tribunal) in their election petition filed charges against the Returning Officer against the present writ petitioner that he had constituted the allegations made in the election petition. No charges were laid against him; the returning officer was the only appropriate party Could respond to the allegations so the Returning Officer was like this, where appropriate party presence was necessary for effective decision in matters of election petitions, provisions of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, after the implementation of the election petitions, the defendants made their election. The civil code of conduct may be amended to enable the provisions of the Code of Conduct, 1908. Apply a Returning Officer who is a reasonable party response
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
