NIAMAT ALI versus JOINT DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF NATIONAL SAVINGSFAISALABAD
Section 4 Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules, 1973, Rr 5 (1) (ii) and 6 The justification for dismissal from employment on the basis of the actual dispute of the summary procedure involved in this case is that the regular inquiry applicant Should have been done with the association. He had the opportunity to examine witnesses and present evidence in defense. The preliminary investigation had the effect of an officer not belonging to the appellant, the supply of R6 of the Utilities and Discipline Rules 1973 should have been suppressed, under which they were to be charged. His statement to the accused along with the statement of the allegations explaining the allegations and other related circumstances was proposed by the appellant after the apology, the incident was declared compulsory. And needed regular investigation to determine. The voluntary or unnecessary nature of such amnesty
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
