GHULAM FARID versus SECRETARY TO MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS, ISLAMABAD
5 and 6 There was no formal inquiry against a dismissed government employee in which he could examine the evidence presented against him and testify in his defense. There was no justification for the summary procedure that was adopted against the civil servant. Defending itself against the action proposed against it, no action was actually proposed in the notice, the notice was submitted to the civil servant and such notice was not in accordance with the requirements of the rule of the public servant. Evidence of the allegations was not regularly investigated and the employee was not provided with any opportunity for trial or evidence preparation, his employment was not sustainable in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
