ABDUL MAJEED versus ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER (STAFF), CENTRAL TELECOMMUNICATION REGION, LAHORE
5 to 6 job removals, involvement of disputed questions, summary procedure authorized by official officer was not justified The allegations leveled against the civil servant were of a nature that required regular investigation. Where he had the opportunity to examine witnesses and present evidence. Although a preliminary inquiry was made in defense, there was nothing on the record that the civil servant was involved in such an investigation, there was nothing in the record to show that the authorized officer had any in mind. The request was transferred with the need for investigation. Did not promote the interests of justice Authorized officers' option to deal with a permanent inquiry was open to judicial review The respondents were instructed to proceed with an inquiry against a civil servant and the law passed the order. went.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from FR Bannu lawyer